**This post of mine just went up over at Book Riot, but for those of you who aren't BR readers, I wanted to have this conversation/mind dump of info with you, as well. Also, I can insert GIFs here. So. It's a two-part post, and part two will go up next week. I'll post it here, as well. Feel free to leave your two cents in either spot.**
If there’s one thing I love almost as much as books, it’s making lists of books. Books I own, books I own that I haven’t read, books I own that have purple covers- whatever. While I used to do this on a spreadsheet, the internet has kindly provided a digital way to catalogue my books with the ADDED BONUS of allowing me to interact with other bookish folks. The two most popular book cataloguing/social networking sites seem to be Goodreads and LibraryThing.So which one should you use? What are the benefits/drawbacks of each? I’ve got accounts on both sites and have done some major digging into their terms of service (TOS) and various functionalities to give you some (many) points to consider about both sites. It’s a ridiculous amount of information, so I’ll be splitting this over two weeks. This week, we’ll consider how to add books to your library, the book recommendation functions, stats, the user interfaces, and discussion/groups.
_________________________
I. ADDING BOOKS TO YOUR LIBRARY
The biggest difference here is that LibraryThing assumes you own the books you are adding. With Goodreads, you have to click “edit my review,” scroll down, and click “I own a copy” for it to be counted as a book you own. If you’re cataloguing for insurance purposes, those extra steps on Goodreads can be a deal-breaker.
In Batches
Both sites allow you to import an existing list, if you have one, via a file or webpage. I scanned my books with an app on my phone*, which converted the data to a URL. I plugged that into the right box on both sites and boom–insta list. HOWEVER. On Goodreads, there’s no way to batch-tag or batch-shelve books that you import. It automatically shelves them under “read.” I happened to be shelving my “to-read” books that I own, so I had to go in and fix each individual book. On LibraryThing, you can batch-tag an incoming file (useful for things like “books in my office” or “books in kids’ room”), AND you can shelve a file under “to read” or “read but not owned” if you want.
Both sites allow you to import an existing list, if you have one, via a file or webpage. I scanned my books with an app on my phone*, which converted the data to a URL. I plugged that into the right box on both sites and boom–insta list. HOWEVER. On Goodreads, there’s no way to batch-tag or batch-shelve books that you import. It automatically shelves them under “read.” I happened to be shelving my “to-read” books that I own, so I had to go in and fix each individual book. On LibraryThing, you can batch-tag an incoming file (useful for things like “books in my office” or “books in kids’ room”), AND you can shelve a file under “to read” or “read but not owned” if you want.
Individually
Goodreads- search for a book in the search box, find the one you want, click “add to my books.” Done and done. You can also go under the “My Books” tab, click “add books,” and search that way. As far as I can tell, Goodreads only uses Amazon as a data source. If your book isn’t on Amazon, you have to add it by hand.(**ETA: A commenter on Book Riot told me that this isn’t true anymore. Goodreads now sources its data from Ingram and other places.)
Goodreads- search for a book in the search box, find the one you want, click “add to my books.” Done and done. You can also go under the “My Books” tab, click “add books,” and search that way. As far as I can tell, Goodreads only uses Amazon as a data source. If your book isn’t on Amazon, you have to add it by hand.(**ETA: A commenter on Book Riot told me that this isn’t true anymore. Goodreads now sources its data from Ingram and other places.)
LibraryThing- search for a book, click on the one you want, click “add to your library.” There’s also an “Add Books” menu on your homepage, which eliminates a step. ALSO- LibraryThing lets you select the source you use when searching. Want to add books using the Library of Congress? You can do that. Amazon? Sure. There are over 700 data sources, and you can narrow them down by language or country.
• ALSO ALSO- as someone who has a lot of pre-ISBN books, LibraryThing’s search functionality/database for older editions is far superior. For example, if I type in “gone with the wind 1936 edition” in both sites under “Add Books,” Goodreads gives me a no results error. LibraryThing gives me a recent edition of the book, and then several editions published in 1936.
Winner: LibraryThing, by a country mile.
II. BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS
Both sites offer book recommendations based on your profile.
Goodreads- The site offers you recommendations based on your shelves. You have to rate at least 20 books in order to get recommendations (similar to how Netflix recommendations work). The algorithm shows its face here- if I look for recommendations from my “read” shelf, I get The Lightning Thief, How They Were Found by Matt Bell (whom I’ve never heard of), two Raymond Carver books, and theChicago Manual of Style. Er, what? You can also look up a book’s page and see “people who like this also like that.”
LibraryThing- You don’t have to rate anything to get recommendations here. Based on my existing catalogue, the site recommends four Dickens books I haven’t read yet, North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell, Lord of the Flies, and some Henry James. This bookseller knows me well. You can also select “member recommendations” instead of LibraryThing recommendations, which suggested I read Sabriel(which I have read, and loved), some Neil Gaiman, some Hemingway I’ve never even heard of, and some Agatha Christie. THESE PEOPLE ALSO KNOW ME WELL. Oddly, LibraryThing also offers “unsuggestions”- books that are the LEAST likely to show up in your library. Which. Okay.
Winner: This really depends on your preference. Goodreads is more likely to expand your horizons, while LibraryThing is more likely to give you a sure thing.
III. STATS
Goodreads: You can see your average rating and how many books are on all your shelves right there on your profile page. There’s no way I could find to see info about your books’ original languages, or any stats about pub dates of books. BUT if you go into your books and click “stats,” you can see stats about your reading broken down by year. It shows how many pages you read, the longest book you read, a pie chart of your reading broken down by your shelves, and shows the books you read broken down by how many stars you gave them.
LibraryThing: The site has a dedicated page for “statistics/memes.” It shows you how many books you have in your library, stats on original languages (right now I have 16 books that were originally French, 6 Spanish, 5 Ancient Greek, etc.), a bar graph of your average ratings, bar graphs of your library’s pub dates, and more. I LOVE that it shows you all the series in your library AND whether or not your series is “complete.” Other notable things on the stats page:
• Options to look at books based on events within them, characters, places. Want to find books you own that have events that occur in Alaska? Click places, scroll down to “Alaska,” there you go. Character and event searches work the same way.
• Want to see how many authors you read are male vs. female? How many are dead vs. alive? Their nationalities broken down into a pie chart? Because LT has this.
• You can look up the most controversial books in your library, as determined by THE STANDARD OF DEVIATION IN THE STAR RATINGS IN THE SYSTEM. NERDGASM.
• Options to look at books based on events within them, characters, places. Want to find books you own that have events that occur in Alaska? Click places, scroll down to “Alaska,” there you go. Character and event searches work the same way.
• Want to see how many authors you read are male vs. female? How many are dead vs. alive? Their nationalities broken down into a pie chart? Because LT has this.
• You can look up the most controversial books in your library, as determined by THE STANDARD OF DEVIATION IN THE STAR RATINGS IN THE SYSTEM. NERDGASM.
Winner: Goodreads stats page is prettier and more graphics-heavy, but LT’s is ultimately easier to use and has much more information.
IV. USER INTERFACE
Goodreads- The ease-of-use of Goodreads’ interface is its real strength. People who are used to (pre-crazy-Timeline) Facebook will probably prefer this. It’s very well organized, intuitive, things are easy to find, the graphics are pretty, etc. It’s well-designed.
LibraryThing- There are a lot of words on your home page, and on every page. Lots and lots of words. A lot of the stuff on the homepage–featured authors, early reviewer stuff, giveaways, etc.–is totally irrelevant to my interests, so it’s just clutter. The site looks like it hasn’t been touched by a graphic designer since 2000. (ETA: I did figure out how to clean up the homepage, but the fact that it took me a few days says something about the ease of use.)
Winner- Goodreads, no question. LibraryThing’s home page offers tons of info, but it can be overwhelming. Goodreads has most of the same stuff, but it is tucked away in menus I don’t have to look at if I don’t want to.
V. DISCUSSIONS AND GROUPS
Both sites have discussions and groups about a variety of topics, from reading challenges to Vegan Book Clubs. More users on Goodreads means there are more people to talk to, but it does seem like the types of conversations going on are different. I’ve noted the most popular groups below to give you an idea of what I mean.
Goodreads- Goodreads allows you to have conversations about books without joining/starting a group, OR you can join/start a group. At this writing, the most popular tags for Goodreads groups are: book club, fantasy, romance, roleplay, fiction, fun, books, young adult, science fiction, mystery. When I click on discussions happening now, the top ten include seven discussions about YA novels, one aboutMiddlesex, one about hate-worthy characters in a mystery book, and one in Italian (which I sadly do not speak).
LibraryThing- Fewer users means fewer conversations. The most popular tags for groups on LibraryThing are: challenges, group read, librarything, literature, religion, science-fiction, authors, books, history, fantasy. The most active groups include Pro and Con (progressives and conservatives), a Harry Potter discussion group, Let’s Talk Religion, a few book challenge groups, and something called “Literary Snobs” (I would probably love this).
Winner: Personal preference! It SEEMS like GR has more YA conversations happening, which might have something to do with the “Facebook” ness of its interface- it draws younger readers. But it’s super easy to find WHATEVER conversation happening in both places. Just know that if you’re casually browsing the book conversations, at GR you’re going to see more WHO IS HOTTER EDWARD OR HARRY, whereas at LT it’s going to be more brainy/hot topic-oriented conversation.
So that’s it for this week. Next week, we’ll look at how both sites handle reviews, author interactions, other notable stuff/ things, and the bottom line.


I actually prefer the groups and discussions on Shelfari to these two. That's the best thing Shelfari has going for it. I haven't really got into any of the Goodread groups, either due to the high school feel of them, or not frequent activity. And the latter holds for the LibraryThing ones as well.
ReplyDeleteI thought about including Shelfari, but it's now "Shelfari by Amazon," which. I'm not a fan. BUT BUT LibraryThing is 40% owned by Amazon since they bought Abebooks...but the owner didn't sell directly to Amazon...so...*sigh.* Conflict.
DeleteYeah, Shelfari's up time seems to have gone downhill since Amazon bought it and rebranded it. Almost half the time I go there, none of the flash elements will load, or the entire page.
DeleteI didn't know Amazon owned part of LibraryThing. Seems like they slowly taking over most things related to books, like Ancestry did with genealogy sites.
Doesn't it? I hate it. Amazon's ownership of LT is only because they bought AbeBooks. I sort of get the feeling that LT's owner wasn't happy about the situation. He retains his majority ownership of the company, which you can feel in how the site plays out. It just feels more small-shop, user-centered, as opposed to 100% profit-driven.
DeleteI haven't heard of Library Thing but I'm inclined to check it out. I currently use Goodreads and I agree about the YA conversations. Especially when I search for groups...
ReplyDeleteThanks for this and I look forward to part 2
You're welcome! You should check out LT, but beware that it's not free if you want to shelve more than 200 books (something I mention in part two of the post, but think people should know going in).
DeleteI'd never heard of Library Thing either and immediately checked it out. After looking at a few of the profiles randomly I think I'll just stick with Goodreads. It seems like LT has a more snobbish (but in a totally good way) book-nerd feel to it, which is great, but I like the interface of GR better. I used to have a Shelfari account, but again, found GR to be more user-friendly. I think GR is a bit less tweeny/YA than Shelfari as well.
ReplyDeleteI think you're right- it is more snobbish (I happen to think that's good, I'm sure some people find it off-putting). Honestly, I think there's a simple reason: since it's a paid site that isn't as pretty, there are less high school students. Actually, I've never encountered a single high school student on LT. Which means less YA/paranormal convos, (Big generalities here, but I think I'm right) more of a snobbysnob feel.
DeleteI think I would use LibraryThing if it weren't for the price tag. :( I'll take the GR drama and save my moneys thx.
ReplyDeleteHa, fair enough! It is pay-what-you-can, if that convinces you to try it :) Some people only pay $1 per year. And you can always try it for free up to 200 books.
DeleteWhen I upgraded my LT to a pay account, it was like $20 for a life-time membership. WORTH IT. Plus, Goodreads is blocked on my work computer, but LT is not. So, clear winner for me. :)
DeleteYou should join Literary Snobs! I'm part of it - it's a nice group, very diverse in what's read.
ReplyDeleteI'm on both websites. I joined LibraryThing first and use it only for what books I own. GoodReads is for what books I've read and my massive wishlist. Personally, I prefer LibraryThing because you can edit and add so much more data (book condition, where you got it from, tags), and I find the groups easier to navigate and post in.
I forgot to add that LibraryThing is better both with older books and, as I've more recently found, books from non-U.S. publishers. I was trying to add books from Penguin India to my wishlist on GoodReads and getting frustrated at the lack of data. But I love GoodReads' synopses!
DeleteI joined! Right now it seems they're focused on raging about 50 Shades, hehe. I'll stick around until the anger dies down. I agree, LT is better with cataloguing books on all fronts. It's easier to navigate (though not as pretty) and more accurate.
DeleteThe major thing for me is that Goodreads is absolutely free, whatever the number of books you enter - I have a total of 1150. And so many ways to use it
ReplyDeleteYou're right! The tradeoff there is, of course, ads (and a heavier "this site is for promo" feel, but I don't think that really bothers most people [but it does bother me]).
DeleteOne thing you didn 't mention about groups (which is a HUGE deal for me) is the difference in layout. GR has lots of folders and subfolders so everything's nice and neatly categoized. LT has no organization....just one big long list of topics.
ReplyDeleteThe other thing I prefer about GR is that each book has a summary, and there are lists of editions with associated ISBN. (Of course, a lot of this info is now missing and/or wrong ever since the huge database debacle at the end of last year. Grr.) LT assumes you already know everything about the book when cataloging it.
Also, LT is always accessible. On GR, I get the "over capacity" message with the cute little picture of Alice (or whatever people are now calling her) ALL THE TIME.
Finally, for those folks who are put off LT because it isn't free: you can pay as little as $1 a year to have a paid account with unlimited features. That's close enough to free for me!
UGH YOU ARE SO RIGHT. I HATE the organization (or lack thereof) of the LT groups. I love that GR's are so nicely laid out so you can easily find "rules" or "what is this group about" or "welcome" or whatever, which is where I usually go to find out whether I want to join.
Deleteno experience with librarything, but i will plug that goodreads is great as a teaching tool in the classroom with students! also, sometimes goodreads seems reaaaaaaaaaaaaaallly slow to me. but i like it for keeping track and for recommendations!
ReplyDeleteOooo, never thought of that! I know some schools and libraries use it for book clubs, is that what you're using it for?
DeleteWell if nothing else it seems your article will raise awareness of LT, generating more users and hopefully combating one of the problems you have with it, i.e. lack of people!
ReplyDeleteI must admit I've been with LT for years and it has been really nice to see the site grow and develop. The guys that work on it blog about new features that they're working on and often get members to run experiments and test things out for them. Also I hope in the second part of your article you will look at how LT has helped to catalogue famous peoples libraries, which is not only useful for keeping records, but allows you to compare your library with theirs. I now know I share 21 books with Sir Walter Scott and 46 with Thomas Jefferson, and can you really put a price on such valuable information! Oh and SantaThing! Mention SantaThing! SantaThing rocks and clearly tips the balance in LT's favour.
I admit that I haven't really got to grips with GR, mainly because when I tried to set up an account I managed to spam everyone on my friends list on Facebook, which instantly put me off. Also I'd never heard of it until the whole bullying insanity broke out over there, which wasn't exactly a great way for me to hear about it.
"Well if nothing else it seems your article will raise awareness of LT, generating more users and hopefully combating one of the problems you have with it, i.e. lack of people"
DeleteI hope so! I was really surprised how many people here and on Book Riot had never even heard of it. I don't think I've mentioned the legacy libraries in part two, though I may put it under the "other notable things" category- the posts are already so long for internet reading that I had to leave out a few things. And yes, the bullying thing is awful PR for Goodreads, and apparently they're handling it by "hiding" reviews that are about author behavior on the site. Censoring users is idiotic, in my opinion.
I haven't tried Library Thing. It sounds great but I already use Goodreads and I'd rather spend less time cataloging my reading than more so I'm apt to remain oblivious. This, however, did not dissuade from my enjoyment of this comparison.
ReplyDeleteGoodreads does show your books by publication year, it's one of the three categories you can break it down by in the stats. What it doesn't show you is the title of those books when you click on the individual dots. It also doesn't show you any of that other cool info LibraryThing does.
ReplyDeleteOn GR, you can't search for a book like this: "title publication date" (I mean you CAN but it won't bring up any results). You CAN search like this: "title," "sort by pub date," scrollll scrollll scroolllll till you find the one you want. On LT, you search like this: "title publication date." One step=better.
DeleteInteresting. I think this is a great service you're providing by reviewing both sites, so thanks! My personal reaction to these options, a number of years ago, was to open an LT account, get to 199 books while not really having that much fun, and give up; several years later, I started a book blog and that seems to fit my needs, the end. (I like the list-making, conversating, etc. but the idea of duplicating at multiple sites is a deal-killer for me.) That said, I think services like these are great for readers and reading and I'm glad they're out there. As a librarian, I'm glad to know a little about them (since I'm, gasp, not a user), so thank you again for that.
ReplyDeleteI'm on LT & GR (not as active as I was or would like to be). I'm probably one of the few who joined LT first because they have much better recommendations algorithm, probably due to a more snobbish population (as we all agree: not a bad thing).
ReplyDeleteI am now on both and enjoy both sites for different reasons - the "ease" of GR and the maturity level of LT. I think GR is great for book readers while LT is great for book lovers / collectors.
Many people use GR to keep track of their "to read", and "read" lists - which is much better than LT and I can look it up on my phone whenever I'm in the library, however, LT is much better at keeping track of your book collection due to many reasons mentioned above.
The sites are complimentary as I see it.
http://www.ManOfLaBook.com
With the flexibility of shelf creation in GR though, you could add an "own" shelf and make it "sticky" so it is on the top. I've also added extra "exclusive" shelves, so I can mark a book as abandoned, for instance. The default settings are one thing, but there are ways to go deeper,
ReplyDeleteRight, I did that, but having the extra step of having to mark something as owned is annoying for me. I don't have to make any extra steps in LT. Now, if you would rather the system DIDN'T assume you own something, you have to take extra steps on LT. In both sites, you can make it do what you want somehow. I'd rather not take extra time to go deeper if I don't have to.
DeleteThis is great, I really needed this kind of rundown. I don't have time for two sites. I like LT better but GR is what I use. Will you talk about whether one of these sites is better than the other for networking and bringing new readers to your blog? Or which one tends to have better reviews?
ReplyDeleteI get A LOT of hits to this blog of people who are coming over from Goodreads, but my LT account is so new that it hasn't really had a chance to generate any traffic. I'd say GR is probably better for the blog thing. As for reviews, I think they're about equal. There are MORE reviews on GR, but there are higher quality ones on LT.
Delete