Wednesday, May 9, 2012

The Prophet by Khalil Gibran

So, once upon a time I read The Shack, and I hated it. (See also that other writer of questionable Christian silliness: Mandino, Og.) Also once upon a time, I read The Alchemist and I hated it. And ALSO once upon a time, I read The Devil and Miss Prym because I like to give a guy a second chance, and I hated it and decided that if I were ever forced into a TO THE DEATH cage match, I would challenge Paulo Coelho because EVEN IF I DIED at least I'd get to punch that guy in the face.

The obvious theme here is that I don't dig "inspirational" literature. As you all know, my number one literary pet peeve is being preached at (WRITE AN ESSAY FOR GOD'S SAKE) so what possesses me to ever pick up a book that EXISTS FOR THAT PURPOSE I will never know. I think it's because I wanted to go back to the source. I was curious about the fountainhead of all inspirational/spiritual fiction: Gibran's The Prophet. The book at whose altar Deepak Chopra probably makes daily ablutions. That's right people. Gibran was your spiritual guru before being a guru was a million dollar enterprise.

Photobucket

So basically, The Prophet is about a prophet. He lives in a city and decides he's going to peace out because prophets? They're a traveling band. Just before he peaces out, all the Townsfolk are like, yo. Tell us about some shit. So he does. The beginning of each chapter features a new Townsfolk saying something like, "Tell us about clothes (no I'm not joking, really, tell us the spiritual aspect of clothing)," or law, or crime, or beauty (which The Prophet is a BIG FAN OF, obvs- you can't be a guru without loving the trees and flowers and ugly people, etc.), or death, or whatever. And it's all very deep and flowery and Oprah would love it.

  Photobucket

DUDES. Let's be clear. My blleeerrgghness about this has little to do with the literary merit and everything to do with my personal preference (hating inspirational psuedo-lit) and the style. It also irritates my pre-existing spiritual sitch because it has a lot of Biblical stuff going on, except Gibran does things like quote the Bible and then contradict what he just said by watering it down a good bit, generally with a cute little literary flourish. I don't like literary flourishes, and since I'm pretty familiar with the Bible and it's No Nonsense, Generally Straightforward Proverbial Business, I'm more comfortable with that. So then I moved from I Don't Like How This is Written Because This Genre Makes Me Violent INTO Also I Think A Lot of What He Is Saying Is True But Also A Lot Of What He Is Saying Is Feel-Good Oprah-liscious Bullshit and the bullshit distracts me. 

So yeah. If you dig your literature with a heavy sidecar of Inspiration, and if reading what is basically a very hugtastic sermon is your jam, SPREAD THIS SHIT ON TOAST. However, if you're on the cynical side and think that anything that would be shelved next to anything by Ekhart Tolle (including Ekhart Tolle) is probably crap, approach this book with dread and fear. 

ONE STAR due to personal preference. You may love it.

13 comments:

  1. When I was 20 I read Gibran and lliked, no, loved his inspirational shtick. I doubt if I could make through a page now. You're right, Oprah would love it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. HA. In college, I was gifted with about four copies of The Prophet from casual acquaintances who know I was bookish and woo-woo-y in spiritual terms, and so thought that would be my kind of thing. No thanks. I keep reading Coehlo even though I know he makes me bonkers. I hate inspiring stuff -- am I hater?

    ReplyDelete
  3. WORD, sistah. I too despise inspirational books. And inspirational music, inspirational movies, etc. I just HATE HATE HATE to be emotionally manipulated.
    I gave Paulo Coehlo two chances, too, (Veronica Decides to Die and The Alchemist) and thought both books were trite and obnoxious. So I probably won't be picking up The Prophet any time soon. Thanks for the warning!
    Go cynics!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just as some food for thought, do you feel like cynical books are also emotionally manipulative? Just throwing it out there for discussion's sake.

      Delete
    2. Well I don't feel like cynical books are emotionally manipulating ME because I'm already there. No manipulation necessary. So much so, in fact, that I can't think of any overtly cynical books off the top of my head, probably because I just consider them "realistic."

      Delete
  4. The Alchemist made me want to rip my eyeballs out and shove them down the garbage disposal. Terrible terrible terrible...I'm taking it you haven't read Mitch Albom? Oh you should! (*cue evil grin)

    ReplyDelete
  5. See also, The Celestine Prophecy

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's even crappier in the original Arabic. Jubran does have *some* good things, though EVERYTHING he's ever written is ripped off from Nietzsche. (Jubran's good things are those that don't manage to distort Nietzsche's message.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, but note that The Prophet was originally written in English, even though Gibran's native language was Arabic.

      Delete
  7. You are SO RIGHT about The Alchemist. And I couldn't even finish The Shack. Don't know why I started. Will scrupulously avoid The Prophet. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amanda, you are the bomb! I don't agree with everything you say, but I love the way you say it. Clever, clever girl! So glad I found this site.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Amanda, you are the bomb! I don't agree with everything you say, but I love the way you say it. Clever, clever girl! So glad I found this site.

    ReplyDelete