Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Banned Book Week: Can Your Kids Read Whatevs?

There's been a bit of discussion in this year's banned book week about children and their access to books. Ben over at Dead End Follies did a post that's sparked a bit of discussion, and there was that kerfuffle in Missouri about the banning/not banning/pseudo-banning of Slaughterhouse Five, along with a bunch of other school-related bannings earlier in the year.

So here's the thing. Monitoring what your kids, YOUR kids (not other people's kids), read, is not the same thing as banning books. Lemmesplain. In my brain, banning a book is removing it from stores or libraries so the public cannot read it. This includes school libraries. You're making a moral judgement for other adults or other adults' kids. This? This is wrong. But when I tell my ten year old that s/he isn't old enough to read American Psycho or Naked Lunch or whatever, and I take it away from them (to be given back at whatever age I deem appropriate, if they're still interested), that's not the same thing as book banning. It's parenting.

In discussing this with other bloggers on Twitter and elsewhere, the argument arises that books are self-regulating, and that a kid who is too young for a certain book won't be interested in it, and it they do get hold of it, won't get the mature themes. This isn't necessarily true. I picked up a book from my mom's bedside table when I was about 8 that ended up being about mob violence and had a graphic rape scene that I FULLY understood. I had nightmares for weeks. As an adult, I can say with complete honesty that I wish my mother had noticed I'd taken the book and hadn't let me read it. We did have the sort of relationship where I could have gone to her and talked about it, but I didn't know what to say, and she couldn't take those images away just by listening to an eight year old talk about it.

I'm not saying this is black and white. There are books that I wouldn't let one kid read that I would let another kid of the same age read, based on mental and emotional maturity. And it's true that the same themes are present on television and in movies- that my kids won't be watching until I'm comfortable with it. And there is ugliness in the world, but that doesn't mean young children are emotionally or mentally capable of understanding or dealing with it. And just because  violence and rape and (whatever thing you don't want a kid reading about, insert your deal here) exists in the world and they will encounter it eventually, that doesn't mean I have to be the conduit through which they experience it.

All of this to say, I would never impose my ideas about what's appropriate for a kid to read on another parent. And if you plan on (or already do) let your kids read any and everything at any and every age, rock on. I'm sure you do it responsibly and thoughtfully. No one is out to do badly by their children. And I would never EVER march into a school, store or library armed with my personal convictions about what is ok and demand a book be removed from the shelves or curriculum. Teachers who handle hundreds of kids in their life (as opposed to my...two...) know better about what kids at [insert age] can handle than I claim to. But my house is floor to ceiling books, and a curious nine year old might just grab whatever because it has an interesting cover and they're bored. If that thing they grab happens to be Lady Chatterley's Lover, I'm taking it away for now and quickly giving them something more age-appropriate. That doesn't make me a book banner. It just makes me a parent...maybe a strict one, but that's not wrong.

*To clarify- my issues are mainly with graphic sexual content and violence. I wouldn't ever stop my child from reading something because of the ideas presented. For example, my husband and I are Christians, but I wouldn't stop them from reading something about atheism or whatever. I think Sarah Palin is nuts, but I wouldn't stop my kid from reading her books...though I would cry a little [but again, this is personal- if your family is Jewish and you don't want your kids reading the philosophy of anti-semitism, I'm not going to argue with you]. The exploration of ideas does not, in my opinion, have an age appropriate standard. The exposure to graphic violence or erotic content does.

23 comments:

  1. I am Muslim and I read every thing even if a book have graphic violence or erotic content I just skip them but never ban a book from reading because I will trust my kids and teach them that they must always return to me if they have a question about an issue but still won't make them read books with sex until they are old enough to skip it like I do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree one hundred percent. Parent your own kids, not other people's.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here! Here! Couldn't agree more. Well, maybe I could, but only if there were favorable opinions of chocolate cake or my dog or Iron and Wine Pandora stations involved.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agreed. I think monitoring what your own kids read and deciding what is appropriate for them is very different than book banning, which is deciding what everyone else can read. I wouldn't say a parent who says their young kids can't watch something like The Sopranos is banning tv. They're just saying this show isn't appropriate for their kids right now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a very interesting discussion. I absolutely agree with you Amanda, but here's a question just for discussion's sake - what if your child were in a class where a book you were completely morally against was mandatory reading? How do you deal with that? What if the teacher wasn't open to letting them read something else and insisted they would get a 0 on the assignment if they didn't read the book?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nicely worded post. There's such a clear and wide divide between parenting your own child by monitoring what she reads and book banning that I don't get why others don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ines- Word ;)

    Nevey- But that's my point- deciding that your kid can't read something ISN'T "banning." It's only banning when you tell everyone else they can't read it, either.

    Julie- Thank you!

    Sara- Umm chocolate cake is awesome and your dog is cute and Iron and Wine is my jam.

    Red- I didn't think of that, but you're right. It's not banning television. It isn't even banning The Sopranos because you're not asking it to be removed from broadcast.

    IngridLola- To be honest, if the book is so screwy that I have problems with it, I would bet that other parents would, too. Like, for example...I dunno, 6th graders reading Mein Kampf or something. I don't know many parents who would be ok with that. So my answer would probably involve group action. In general, I would trust the teacher, but if s/he isn't even open to my problems with the book (like the teacher in your example) and won't even listen to me, I would take it to the principal. When push comes to shove, if I REALLY TRULY don't think my child should read something, they won't read it- not even for a grade. I won't be bullied ;)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great topic. I don't have kids so you can take what I have to say with a grain of salt. But I agree that there's a huge difference between "banning" and restricting something because it isn't age-appropriate.
    Intentionally exposing children to violence or pornography is borderline abusive, in my {humble} opinion. I know people who let their kids watch whatever they want on television (they don't read) with no regulation whatsoever and those kids can't go to sleep without a light on, they get scared easily, and constantly think they "see" things. While that may not technically be "abuse" it's certainly not exactly responsible - again in my {humble} opinion.

    In a comment on another blog, a parent mentioned that she shields her children from scary books and movies because they're prone to nightmares. That's not banning books, that's knowing your own child responding accordingly. There's a big difference between that and keeping a child from reading things because you don't want them to grow up to disagree with your ideology.

    Anyway, short answer: I'm with you on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  9. WORD. I also read some stuff as a kid that I absolutely should not have been allowed to read - not that I made it easy for my parents to stop me, as I was pretty sneaky. I'm okay with kids reading morally questionable stuff or advanced stuff, but there are some topics out there that kids can understand but can't reconcile to their worldview (like your rape example above).

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with your overall post and this statement: "I would never impose my ideas about what's appropriate for a kid to read on another parent." However, I disagree that "Teachers who handle hundreds of kids in their life (as opposed to my...two...) know better about what kids at [insert age] can handle than I claim to." There are lots of good teachers out there but they can never know a child like a caring parent does. Regardless of how much literature I read, as a librarian I will make suggestions but never assume that I know best when it comes to kids and books. Teachers and school administrators do impose ideas about books onto kids and I don't think we should assume that just because they are the "teacher" that they know what's best for each individual child. As much as it disappoints me to hear about parents yanking kids from classrooms or forcing their kid to read a different book than the class, I totally respect the parents' right to in fact parent their child. I guess what I'm saying is, experts get things wrong all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wonderful post. I completely agree that parents have the right to determine what is or isn't suitable for their child to read but that right does not extend to other's children.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's crazy how complicated parenting is. My girl (9) comes home all the time and "so and so is allowed to do this." I say, "Good for so and so but I'm not her Mom. I'm yours and I say NO." I'm not parenting anyone else's kid, thank you. I think it comes down to the kid. My girl is not ready for books that have more controversial topics in them than worm eating.

    Sometimes I think I'm more strict than my mom was about books and I wonder if it's a society thing. We have all these books telling us, "You're going to ruin your kids!" and they didn't have that. When I was a teen my mom let me read whatever and I wonder if I'll be able to do the same. I hope so.

    I know parents never made a big deal about the books we read in school (that I know of). The teacher was the boss so they let them do their job.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with this wholeheartedly. I don't even think I could add anything to it. Great post.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Rock on! So well said. I'm a pretty strict mom when it comes to what my kids watch and read--but they are my kids. I would never impose my beliefs on someone else. My responsibility as a parent is to monitor my own children, not to require everyone to conform to my ideas of what is appropriate for children of a certain age. I am a Christian as well and I completely agree that children should not be sheltered from opposing ideas, just protected from potentially harmful content that is not age-appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I wouldn't let my kids read anything I didn't read first, at least until they are in their late teens.

    I have absolutely no issue with parents censoring what their kids read, that's parenting. The issue I have is with institutions (education or otherwise) doing so and with some well meaning hypocrite who feel that they simply must make me and my kids conform to their "standards" of good taste and judgment.

    By the way, great job on Anna Karenina on Librivox :)

    http://www.ManOfLaBook.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. I read whatever when I was a kid, and let my kids do the same.

    When I was in high school, I went to the local library and asked for Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler. The librarian (who became my friend) dug it up from some dusty storage. I'm not a nazi, quite the contrary. I was just curious. It was a really bad book. Later I made a try on Das Kapital by Karl Marx, which was way too advanced. I gave it up :)

    Cold As Heaven

    ReplyDelete
  17. Uh..everyone- thanks for the support, guys! I was feeling a bit like an old codger shaking her stick at "parents these days" or something.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks for sharing these thoughts- this is exactly what I have been thinking over the past few days since Banned Books Week started. I DID have the books I read regulated by my mother- she didn't let me read The Face on the Milk Carton even though I brought it home from the library in middle school because there was a sex scene she didn't think I was ready for. I am very, very grateful that she kept tabs on what I was reading because it showed me that she CARED. She always explained to me exactly why I couldn't read something, and I may have been annoyed but I understood. Now that I am an adult and I choose what I read, I appreciate that freedom even more and I make mental notes now about what I might or might not want my future kids to read until they are older.

    Book BANNING, on the other hand... it's childish.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Of course parents should be able to monitor their childrens' book choices and pull whatever books they deem inappropriate out of their child's tender little hands.

    And, of course people do not have the right to tell anyone else (other adults or children not their own) what they can or cannot read.

    So, basically, I'm in full-agreement with you. Parents, do your thing. If your kids really want to read the book, they'll go find it and read it elsewhere, out of your view. If you catch them, you then have two opportunites: 1) A discussion about rules/boundaries and why they're important 2) A substantive discussion about the book they read, why you wanted them to wait, and what they feel about it, now that the "damage" is done. Talking to our kids is, after all, what we parents (not that I am one - but I am a godfather) should be doing. This is how we guide them -growth & development, both intellectual and emotional. Do you REALLY want them doing it all on their own, with no safe place to turn to when they do have questions or concerns?

    So, yeah. Booyah.

    ReplyDelete
  20. As I said on Twitter, parents have the right to monitor their own child's reading, but not that of other children. I went ballistic a couple of years ago when a neighbor, whom I've never met, sent a mass email out to all the moms in the 'hood and advised against letting kids read any Golden Compass books by Phillip Pullman because of "anti-Christian undertones." On her distribution list were several Jewish moms, and a couple of militant atheists. I knew better, but I still responded with a "don't tell me what I should let my kids read, it's fine if you don't let your kids read them, but you know nothing of my family and values" email. Big mistake. I almost ended up with a prayer group in my driveway. But still--I get to say what my kids read. I was pretty lenient, but there were still a few "wait until you're older" choices along the way.

    ReplyDelete